Find EU-funding for your projects now!Search for FundingSearch for programsReset all filters

  1. Select the type of organisation that you are interested in to implement projects.

    The role of an organisation involved could by lead partner, regular project partner, associate partner, and observers.

    Info
    Type of organisation
  2. Select countries that you are interested in to implement projects.

    The funding regions are defined by countries only. In case only part of a country (certain NUTS regions) is eligible for funding relevant information is provided in the description of the programme.

    Info
    Funding region
  3. Select themes that you are interested in to implement projects.

    16 different thematic keywords were predefined when the database was set up. Each call is classified according to this system either with one, two or more themes to facilitate the search for suitable calls.

    Info
    Topics
  4. You can use free text when searching for interesting calls. All you need to do is to enter a phrase in the text bar that EuroAccess is to look for in its database.

    When looking for a phrase in the free text bar, the system will perform an exact-match search. This means that it will search the database for the exact words, in their exact order. However, you can opt for two different approaches:

    1. You can use “AND”, in this way: One AND Two. EuroAccess will look in the database for the fields which records contain both One and Two, regardless of their order and their position in any sentence.

    2. You can use the “OR”, in this way: One OR Two. In this case, EuroAccess will search the database for fields that contain either the word One or the word Two. It will retrieve all the fields with one of these words or with both.

    However, you should prefer phrases or complex words over simple words in you text searches.

    Info
    Keyword
    Selection of eligible entitiesReset all
  1. An institution, body, office or agency established by or based on the Treaty on European Union and the Treaties establishing the European Communities.

    All education and training facilities for people of different age groups.

    An intergovernmental organization having legal personality under public international law or a specialized agency established by such an international organization. An international organization, the majority of whose members are Member States or Associated Countries and whose main objective is to promote scientific and technological cooperation in Europe, is an International Organization of European Interest.

    A person with legal rights and obligations. Unlike a legal entity, a natural person does not have a legal act (e.g. association, limited liability company, etc.).

    An NPO is an institution or organization which, by virtue of its legal form, is not profit-oriented or which is required by law not to distribute profits to its shareholders or individual members. An NGO is a non-governmental, non-profit organization that does not represent business interests. Pursues a common purpose for the benefit of society.

    A partnership, corporation, person, or agency that is for-profit and not operated by the government.

    Any government or other public administration, including public advisory bodies, at the national, regional or local level.

    A research institution is a legal entity established as a non-profit organization whose main objective is to conduct research or technological development. A college/university is a legal entity recognized by its national education system as a university or college or secondary school. It may be a public or private institution.

    A microenterprise, a small or medium-sized enterprise (business) as defined in EU Recommendation 2003/361. To qualify as an SME for EU funding, an enterprise must meet certain conditions, including (a) fewer than 250 employees and (b) an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million. These ceilings apply only to the figures for individual companies.

    Selection of eligible countriesReset all
    Selection of topicsReset all
  1. Administration & Governance, Institutional Capacity & Cooperation 

    This topic focuses on strengthening governance, fostering institutional capacity, and enhancing cross-border cooperation. It includes promoting multilevel, transnational, and cross-border governance by designing and testing effective structures and mechanisms, as well as encouraging collaboration between public institutions on various themes. 

    Innovation capacity and awareness are also key, with actions aimed at increasing the ability of individuals and organizations to adopt and apply innovative practices. This involves empowering innovation networks and stimulating innovation across different sectors. 

    Institutional cooperation and network-building play a crucial role, supporting long-term partnerships to improve administrative processes, share regional knowledge, and promote intercultural understanding. This also includes cooperation between universities, healthcare facilities, schools, sports organizations, and efforts in management and capacity building. 

    This topic focuses on strengthening the agricultural, forestry, and fisheries sectors while ensuring sustainable development and environmental protection. It covers agricultural products (e.g., fruits, meat, olives), organic farming, horticulture, and innovative approaches to sustainable agriculture. It also addresses forest management, wood products, and the promotion of biodiversity and climate resilience in forestry practices.

    In the food sector, the focus lies on developing sustainable and resilient food chains, promoting organic food production, enhancing seafood products, and ensuring food security and safety. Projects also target the development of the agro-food industry, including innovative methods for production, processing, and distribution.

    Fisheries and animal management are essential aspects, with an emphasis on sustainable fishery practices, aquaculture, and animal health and welfare. This also includes efforts to promote responsible fishing, marine conservation, and the development of efficient resource management systems.

    Soil and air quality initiatives play a crucial role in environmental protection and public health. This includes projects aimed at combating soil and air pollution, implementing pollution management systems, and preventing soil erosion. Additionally, innovative approaches to improving air quality—both outdoors and indoors—are supported, alongside advancing knowledge and best practices in soil and air management.

    This topic focuses on protecting the environment, promoting biodiversity, and addressing the challenges of climate change and resource management. It includes efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change, develop low-carbon technologies, and reduce GHG emissions. Biodiversity promotion and natural protection are key aspects. 

    It also covers improving soil and air quality by reducing pollution, managing contamination, preventing soil erosion, and enhancing air quality both outdoors and indoors. Water management plays an essential role, including sustainable water distribution, monitoring systems, innovative wastewater treatment technologies, and water reuse policies. Additionally, it addresses the protection and development of waterways, lakes, and rivers, as well as sustainable wetland management. 

    This topic focuses on preserving, promoting, and enhancing cultural and natural heritage in a sustainable way. It includes efforts to increase the attractiveness of cultural and natural sites through preservation, valorisation, and the development of heritage objects, services, and products. Cultural heritage management, arts, and culture play a key role, including maritime heritage routes, access to cultural sites, and cultural services like festivals, concerts, and art workshops. 

    Tourism development is also central, with actions aimed at promoting natural assets, protecting and developing natural heritage, and increasing touristic appeal through the better use of cultural, natural, and historical heritage. It also covers the improvement of tourist services and products, the creation of ecotourism models, and the development of sustainable tourism strategies. 

    This topic focuses on the sustainable management, protection, and valorisation of natural resources and areas, such as habitats, geo parks, and protected zones. It also includes preserving and enhancing cultural and natural heritage, landscapes, and protecting marine environments. 

    Circular economy initiatives play a key role, with actions aimed at innovative waste management, ecological treatment techniques, and advanced recycling systems. Projects may focus on improving recycling technologies, organic waste recovery, and establishing repair and re-use networks. Additionally, pollution prevention and control efforts address ecological economy practices, marine litter reduction, and sustainable resource use. 

    This topic covers labour market development and employment, focusing on creating job opportunities, optimizing existing jobs, and addressing academic (un)employment and job mobility. It also includes attracting a skilled workforce and improving working conditions for various groups. 

    Strengthening small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and boosting entrepreneurship are key priorities. This includes enhancing SME capacities, supporting social entrepreneurship, and promoting innovative business models. Activities may focus on creating advisory systems for start-ups, spin-offs, and incubators, fostering business networks, and improving the competitiveness of SMEs through knowledge and technology transfer, digital transformation, and sustainable business practices. 

    This topic focuses on fostering community integration and strengthening a common identity by promoting social cohesion, positive relations, and the development of shared spaces and services. It supports initiatives that enhance intercultural understanding and cooperation between different societal groups. 

    Demographic change and migration address key societal challenges, such as an aging population, active aging, and silver economy strategies. It also includes adapting public services and infrastructure to demographic shifts, tackling social and spatial segregation, and addressing brain drain. Migration-related actions cover policy development, strategic planning, and the integration of migrants to create inclusive and resilient communities. 

    All projects where ICT has a significant role, including tailor-made ICT solutions in different fields, as well as digital innovation hubs, open data, Internet of Things; ICT access and connecting (remote) areas with digital infrastructure and services; services and applications for citizens (e-health, e-government, e-learning, e-inclusion, etc.); services and applications for companies (e-commerce, networking, digital transformation, etc.).

    This is about the mitigation and management of risks and disasters, and the anticipation and response capacity towards the actors regarding specific risks and management of natural disasters, for example, prevention of flood and drought hazards, forest fire, strong weather conditions, etc.. It is also about risk assessment and safety.

    This topic focuses on enhancing education, training, and opportunities for children, youth, and adults. It covers the expansion of educational access, reduction of barriers to education, and improvement of higher education and lifelong learning. It also includes vocational education, common learning programs, and initiatives supporting labour mobility and educational networks. Additionally, it addresses the promotion of media literacy, digital learning tools, and the development of innovative educational approaches to strengthen knowledge, skills, and societal participation. 

    This topic emphasizes the role of culture and media in education and social development. It supports initiatives that foster creativity, cultural awareness, and artistic expression among children and youth. Activities include promoting cross-border cooperation in the audiovisual sector, enhancing digital content creation skills, and boosting the distribution of educational and cultural media products. Furthermore, it encourages the development of media literacy initiatives, helping young audiences critically engage with digital and media content. By connecting education, creativity, and media, this topic strengthens cultural identity and supports inclusive, knowledge-based societies. 

    This topic covers actions aimed at improving energy efficiency and promoting the use of renewable energy sources. It includes energy management, energy-saving methods, and evaluating energy efficiency measures. Projects may focus on the energy rehabilitation and efficiency of buildings and public infrastructure, as well as promoting energy efficiency through cooperation among experienced firms, institutions, and local administrations. 

    In the field of renewable energy, this encompasses the development and expansion of wind, solar, biomass, hydroelectric, geothermal, and other sustainable energy sources. Activities include increasing renewable energy production, enhancing research capacities, and developing innovative technologies for energy storage and management. Projects may also address sustainable regional bioenergy policies, financial instruments for renewable energy investments, and the establishment of cooperative frameworks for advancing renewable energy initiatives. 

    This topic focuses on promoting equal rights and strengthening social inclusion, particularly for marginalized and vulnerable groups. It covers activities enhancing the capacity and participation of children, young people, women, elderly people, and socially excluded groups. Activities can address the creation of inclusive infrastructure, improving access and opportunities for people with disabilities, and fostering social cohesion through innovative care services. It also includes initiatives supporting victims of gender-based violence, promoting human rights, and developing policies and tools for social integration and equal participation in society. 

    This area focuses on improving health and social services, enhancing accessibility and efficiency for diverse groups such as the elderly, children, and people with disabilities. It includes the development of new healthcare models, innovative medical diagnostics and treatments (e.g., dementia, cancer, diabetes), and the management of hospitals and care facilities. Additionally, activities addressing rare diseases, promoting overall wellbeing, and fostering preventive health measures fall under this theme. It also covers sports promotion, encouraging physical activity as a means to improve public health and social inclusion. 

    This area focuses on strengthening justice, safety, and security through cross-border cooperation and institutional capacity-building. It includes initiatives aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of police, fire, and rescue services, enhancing civil protection systems, and rapid response capabilities for emergencies like chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear incidents. Activities also target the prevention and combatting of organized crime, drug-related crimes, and human trafficking, as well as ensuring secure and efficient border management. Furthermore, it covers initiatives promoting the protection of citizens, community safety, and the development of innovative security services and technologies. 

    This area focuses on the development and improvement of transport and mobility systems, covering all modes of transport, including urban mobility and public transportation. Actions aiming at improving transport connections through traffic and transport planning, rehabilitation and modernisation of infrastructure, better connectivity, and enhanced accessibility. Projects promoting multimodal transport and logistics, optimising intermodal transport chains, offering sustainable and efficient logistics solutions, and developing multimodal mobility strategies. Also, initiatives establishing cooperation among logistic centres and providing access to clean, efficient, and multimodal transport corridors and hubs. 

    Activities focusing on the sustainable development and strategic planning of urban, regional, and rural areas. This includes urban development such as city planning, urban renewal, and strengthening urban-rural links through climate adaptation, sustainable mobility, water efficiency, participatory processes, smart cities, and the regeneration of public urban spaces. Regional planning and development cover the implementation of regional policies and programmes, sustainable land use management plans, integrated regional action plans, spatial planning, and the efficient management of marine protected areas. Rural and peripheral development addresses the challenges of remote and sparsely populated areas by fostering rural community development, enhancing rural economies, improving access to remote regions, and promoting tailored policies for rural sustainability and growth. 

    Keyword search
Apply selection

Deadline expired

The deadline for this call has expired.

Call key data

Agroecology Partnership - 2nd Call

Funding Program

Horizon Europe

deadlines

Opening
02.12.2024

Deadline
17.02.2025 14:00

Link to the call

Link to the submission

Call content

short description

The agroecology partnership, funded by Horizon Europe, provides cascade funding for proposals tat provide a clear added value to at least one of the general objectives and corresponding core themes of the AGROECOLOGY partnership under which framework this co-funded call is being conducted. The call "integrating environmental, economic and social perspectives in assessing the performance of agroecology- value-chain and policy implications" focuses on the performance of agroecology, under different aspects: evaluating this performance in its various dimensions, quantifying environmental impacts, transforming value chains, and contributing to the design of public policies to better support the transition.

Call objectives

The 2nd co-funded call of the AGROECOLOGY Partnership, Integrating environmental, economic and social perspectives in assessing the performance of agroecology. Value-chain and policy implications, welcomes the submission of proposal responding to one of the following topics:

  • Topic 1: Determine and assess benefits/impacts and trade-offs of agroecology, and identify best practices with following themes:
    • Methods and procedures to tackle trade-offs in agroecological production
    • Scenario analysis to identify and support the most suitable options to accelerate the adoption of the identified best practices at different spatial and temporal scales
  • Topic 2: Transform value chains, businesses and policies to facilitate the transition to agroecology with following themes:
    • Transformation and development of new business models in the value chains to facilitate the agroecological transition
    • Coordination among actors, social innovations and policies to enhance the agroecological transition

read more

Expected effects and impacts

With this second call, the AGROECOLOGY partnership continues the implementation of the priorities identified in AGROECOLOGY’s strategic research and innovation agenda (SRIA).

Research and innovation efforts are necessary to enhance the performance of agroecology from the perspectives of environmental and climate-related benefits, sustainability of agricultural production systems, economic viability and competitiveness of farms, and security of food supply. These efforts should not solely focus on changes in practices at the farm level but broadly encompass entire value chains that play a crucial role in the transition of agricultural production systems.

The evaluation of the performance of agroecology is a critical issue that must be addressed by integrating environmental, climate, economic, and social dimensions. The assessment of the benefits of agroecological approaches is essential for a better recognition of agroecology by the agricultural sector, the market, and by policy-makers.

The general theme of this second call for projects by the AGROECOLOGY partnership focuses on the performance of agroecology, under different aspects: evaluating this performance in its various dimensions, quantifying environmental impacts, transforming value chains (e.g., by developing new economic models within value chains), and contributing to the design of public policies to better support the transition.

The partnership will fund research and innovation projects contributing to the scope of the call by delivering scientific evidence and knowledge that will allow to assess and enhance the performance of agroecology in the various sustainability dimensions.

It is expected that proposals provide a clear added value regarding at least one of the general objectives and corresponding core themes of the AGROECOLOGY partnership, outlined in the corresponding AGROECOLOGY SRIA, under which framework this co-funded call is being conducted.

Furthermore, successful proposals shall contribute to all of the following outcomes/impacts:

  • Practical-oriented knowledge, tools and/or innovations available to farmers and the sector, contributing to the uptake of agroecological practices at local, regional and national scales;
  • Increased knowledge, knowledge transfer and capacity of farmers and agricultural advisors to implement agroecological practices;
  • Increased socio-economic and/or environmental performance of agroecological approaches;
  • Enhanced science-policy interfaces serving to facilitate a faster transition to agroecology.

read more

Expected results

Topic 1: Determine and assess benefits/impacts and trade-offs of agroecology, and identify best practices

Integrated approaches that simultaneously consider the economic, social and environmental dimensions are needed to assess the performance and efficiency of agroecology practices and to identify those practices that are the most suited to specific conditions and locations. Research and innovation are needed to provide appropriate methods and indicators, understand the magnitude of impacts, benefits and trade-offs, including unwanted side effects/ value conflicts.

Environmental impacts must be analysed by considering the different environmental compartments and their connections, to find ways to maximize the ecosystem services provided under specific contexts while minimizing potential trade-offs. The aim is to support the development of practices that increase environmental benefits without degrading economic and social performance.

Expected Outcome Topic 1

Proposals funded under this Topic will improve the understanding and assessment of benefits, (positive and negative) trade-offs, and impacts of agroecology on agricultural production, food security, biodiversity, ecosystem services and the environmental, economic and social footprint at different spatial- (from local to global), and temporal scales. Projects are expected to provide evidence that could support decision making at different levels (e.g. farmers, policymakers, other stakeholders).

Results will in particular feed into the following partnership objectives and activities: 1) to evaluate the agroecology transitions, assessing their impacts and performance , 2) to facilitate exchange between scientists and policymakers and to contribute to the implementation of evidence-based policies supporting the transition to agroecology, and 3) to accelerate the creation and uptake of agroecological practices and innovations by adopting multi-actors and co-design methods (living labs approach)

Scope Topic 1

The vision of agroecology is to redesign agricultural systems by simultaneously considering the social, economic and environmental dimensions. Research and innovation are needed to quantitatively determine the magnitude and the impact of the agroecology transition on these different dimensions. Potential trade-offs should be taken into account. The assessment of the performance of agroecology in cooperation with stakeholders such as farmers, rural communities, consumers and wider society, and policy makers is indispensable and has the potential to identify best practices adapted to specific locations. Several international entities such as FAO or CGIAR are already contributing to define methods and metrics related to the integrated assessment of the tri-dimensional profile if agroecology. However, the suitability of these methods needs to be tested in the European context.

The assessment of the environmental domain of agroecology should consider both abiotic and biotic components and their interactions. Relevant issues for the assessments are resilience to climate change, increasing soil organic matter, water and nutrient use efficiency, water retention and storage, carbon sequestration and long-term carbon storage, the reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants and of nutrient leaching, reduced pesticide use, improved surface- and groundwater quality, prevention of erosion, protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems, among other ecosystem services.

The social dimension should be contemplated in the assessment by including the influence of agroecology on social well-being, livelihoods, working conditions, workforce, gender and social equity. Aspects such as farmers’ perceptions, sustainability of agricultural organizations through their networking with a wide range of stakeholders, social equity, rural development and preservation, and food sovereignty should also be considered.

The economic dimension should include aspects such as economic viability and sustainability of agricultural production systems, financial independence of farmers and agricultural organisations, market access and autonomy, cooperation among farmers, access to and independence from markets, food security and affordability, and fair profit distribution between all actors involved in the agrifood and non-food value chain.

Agroecological approaches already in place such as those developed for example under organic farming should be capitalised on and given due attention in the proposed activities.

All projects funded under Topic 1 should deliver knowledge that helps determine and assess the impact of agroecological approaches in their environmental, social and economic dimensions, in specific contexts and agroclimatic conditions. To this end, suitable indicators should be used to describe and compare the impacts, including trade-offs, of both agroecological and conventional approaches. Their outcome should identify the most suitable practices enhancing the resilience and sustainability of agricultural systems.

Proposals submitted to this Topic are expected to choose at least one of the following themes; the items under white bullets points are just indicative/examples. Furthermore, they have to explain how they will contribute to the Topic 1 expected outcomes and to the general expected impacts of the Call.

  • Theme 1. Methods and procedures to tackle trade-offs in agroecological production by:
    • Developing and applying methods to describe value/goal conflicts and trade-offs inherent in specific agroecological approaches.
    • Implementing new approaches and tools or modifying and combining existing ones to ensure the integrated assessment of the performance of agroecological approaches
    • Defining and testing models for performing environmental, social and economic analyses of positive/negative impacts of agroecological approaches in comparison to conventional practices, under specific contexts. Where appropriate, these models should include the monetary and/or non-monetary valuation of the ecosystem services provided by the farming practices, and include long-term aspects such as the resilience of the system and climate change impacts at territorial/landscape level.
  • Theme 2. Scenario analysis to identify and support the most suitable options to accelerate the adoption of the identified best practices at different spatial and temporal scales.
    • Generating knowledge/evidence on the contribution of agroecology to the economic sustainability and viability at regional and farm community level in the short, medium and long-term vis a vis [conventional] agricultural approaches.
    • Co-designed construction of different scenarios related to identify the long-term ecological and socio-economic implications of agroecological transitions and identification of the elements needed for achieving a just transition to agroecology.
    • Assess the socio-economic implications of adopting circular and sharing economy principles, considering efficiency and sufficiency of resources and environmental impacts.
    • Co-construction of scenarios aiming to contribute to the decision-making of policy makers and public administrations regarding the evaluating existing policies and the identification of the most suitable policies and institutional frameworks to carry out future transition steps towards agroecology. The social (social equity), economic (e.g., competitiveness and viability) and environmental dimensions must be considered simultaneously, along with specific conditions/contexts at regional and farm community levels. It should contribute to identifying the most suitable policies and institutional frameworks for supporting the transitions, taking into account the opportunities that might be offered by public and private funding, as well as the medium-term upscaling opportunities of agroecological approaches.

Topic 2. Transform value chains, businesses and policies to facilitate the transition to agroecology

The European partnership AGROECOLOGY addresses in Core theme 2 of its SRIA the need to redesign value chains to support the transformation of agroecosystems, and in Core theme 4, the role of public policies as enablers of the transition.

Indeed, agroecology transition cannot be performed solely by redesigning agricultural systems since their socio-economic sustainability relies very much on the entire value chain. Value chains associated with intensive modes of agricultural production models typically depend on the specialisation of its actors, high reliance on chemical inputs, and the delivery of a limited number of products. These highly input intensive and input dependent systems have adverse ecological, social and economic impacts.

This topic aims to explore how agricultural value chains can be transformed and diversified in order to support an agroecology transition characterised by “long-term fertility, healthy agro-ecosystems and secured livelihoods” (IPES Food, 2016, p.2). Farmers' choices are closely influenced by the upstream and downstream actors, who determine their access to markets and opportunities that enable them to make this transition. The value of their products on the market also depends on the organization of the supply chains and the ability to offer affordable food and non-food products. To enable the agroecological transition, processing and marketing companies must be equipped to be able to handle new products resulting from agroecological farming that respond to the demands from a diversity of consumers. Additionally, they must establish efficient logistics and marketing networks. Upstream companies must adapt to the emerging needs of agroecological farming with regard to the necessary inputs and machinery needs. This shift may also be accompanied by new forms of interactions and relationships among actors and new distribution systems.

Furthermore, public policies have a major role to play, as they can hinder or enhance the transition towards agroecology, at different scales and levels. Analyzing their current role, their efficiency and defining how they can evolve is needed.

Expected Outcome Topic 2

Research and innovation proposals funded under this Topic will consider the value chains upstream and/or downstream of agroecological production system, and the private and public incentives able to support the transition. They will contribute to a systemic agroecological transition that couples agricultural practices and value chains perspectives through the provision of technological, institutional and social innovations, the development of new business models, the construction of new forms of interactions and relationships among actors, and recommendations for the elaboration of efficient policies. As was the case for Topic 1, results will feed into the following partnership objectives and activities: 1) to evaluate the agroecology transitions, assessing their impacts and performance , 2) to facilitate exchange between scientists and policymakers and to contribute to the implementation of evidence-based policies supporting the transition to agroecology and 3) to accelerate the creation and uptake of agroecological practices and innovations by adopting multi-actors and co-design methods (living labs approach).

Scope Topic 2

The transformation (or creation) of business models or business structures should ensure the economic feasibility of agroecological approaches for all actors. These new business models or business structures could draw on different organisational forms and should integrate a fair calculation of the ecosystem services agroecology may bring to society.

The agroecology transition requires changes in the value chains on the upstream and downstream sectors of agriculture. One key element of agroecological transition is the diversification of the production systems and the heterogeneity of products and co-products, which processing and marketing require specific investments and imply logistical and organisational innovations.

The transformation of distribution channels can support the agroecological transition in various ways, which may include: increasing trust between producers and consumers through short supply chains, maintaining close geographical and social relations between food producers, processors, and consumers; by better informing consumers through these local relationships or through labels and collective brands.

Finally, policies have a strong role to play to support the transition. Existing and potential impacts of policy instruments should be analysed and where possible new instruments should be tested. Research should provide recommendations to policy-makers for the elaboration of public policies at EU, national and territorial/landscape level.

From this perspective, research and innovation projects submitted on the Topic 2 should contribute to the development of new business models or structures, technological or transformative social innovations and to the design of policies to support the agroecological transition. They will also deliver knowledge that allow to assess the impacts of these transformations on the performance of agroecology.

These projects should be carried out following a co-creation and multi-actor approach with relevant stakeholders (farmers, companies, consumers, citizens, local authorities, etc.) as inspired by the living labs methodology.

The experience gathered by the organic farming sector, such as in promoting alternative food networks and new business opportunities, should be considered.

Project proposals submitted to this Topic are expected to choose at least one of the following themes; the items under white bullets points are just indicative/examples. Furthermore, they have to explain how they will contribute to the Topic 2 expected outcomes and to the general expected impacts of the Call.

  • Theme 1 Transformation and development of new business models in the value chains to facilitate the agroecological transition
    • Consider how new business models and/or business structures could value the social and economic benefits of agroecological products and services;
    • Study how the information on the benefits of agroecological approaches could be used to contribute to better traceability and certification procedures
    • Consider opportunities for new businesses related to the development of new, or the adaptation of existing, machinery aiming to reduce labour-intensive activities, and facilitating agroecological practices.
    • Increase knowledge on the ways to cope with the requirements of the different stakeholders related to each agroecological value chain (i.e., storage, preservation, packaging, processing).
    • Contribute to develop business models able to collect, process and add value to new crops, to cope with mixtures of varieties and species (sorting technologies, transformation processes, logistical issues) and to deal with the heterogeneity of agroecology products and co-products.
    • Consider circularity in the agrifood value chains as a driver in the creation of business models for efficient use and consumption of resources and to prevent waste (recycling, processing, packaging)
  • Theme 2 Coordination among actors, social innovations and policies to enhance the agroecological transition
    • Identify the different actors that could be relevant to a transition to agroecological practices in the suitable geographical context; study or propose organisational innovations (across the agrifood value chains as well as between the farmers) to enhance the agroecological transition and assess their feasibility.
    • Study the ways to increase trust between agroecological producers and consumers (e.g., through short supply chains or by maintaining close social relations between food producers, processors, and consumers)
    • Study adapted and alternative logistics and infrastructures to enhance agroecological transition and assess their feasibility by analysing their socio-economic impact.
    • Study innovative types of distribution systems (e.g. box delivery schemes, ‘pick your own’, community-supported agriculture...).
    • Find ways to enhance synergies of agroecology-based value chains with other economic sectors co-existing in the same territory (i.e., tourism, education, sports, etc.) and conventional agriculture-based value chains.
    • Consider macro- and meso-economic factors, and major crises (e.g. climate change, geopolitical context) potentially affecting agroecological transitions and build scenarios for the development of appropriate business models and marketing strategies related to both upstream and downstream commercial activities.
    • Undertake an analysis of the impact of current policy instruments on agroecology transition at national, regional and EU level (e.g., Common Agricultural Policy, but also Regional policies such as Territorial Food Policies and others).
    • Identify and, whenever possible, develop at national or regional level policy, private and market incentives, and other instruments that could be implemented, to enhance the development of agroecology-based value chains.

read more

Eligibility Criteria

Regions / countries for funding

Austria (Österreich), Belgium (Belgique/België), Cyprus (Κύπρος ), Denmark (Danmark), Estonia (Eesti), Finland (Suomi/Finland), France, Germany (Deutschland), Hungary (Magyarország), Italy (Italia), Lithuania (Lietuva), Netherlands (Nederland), Norway (Norge), Portugal, Romania (România), Slovakia (Slovensko), Slovenia (Slovenija), Spain (España), Sweden (Sverige), Türkiye

eligible entities

Education and training institution, Natural Person, Non-Profit Organisation (NPO) / Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), Other, Private institution, incl. private company (private for profit), Public Body (national, regional and local; incl. EGTCs), Research Institution incl. University, Small and medium-sized enterprise (SME)

Mandatory partnership

Yes

Project Partnership

  • Universities and other higher education institutions, public research institutions, profit and non-profit organisations, consumers/citizens, civil society representatives and private companies can apply, subject to the national/regional Funding Party regulations and eligibility criteria. Subject to Funders regulation and where a Living Lab is a legal entity, a Living Lab may be eligible.
  • Research consortia must consist of a minimum of three Partners requesting funding from at least three different Members States or Horizon Europe associated countries and Funders of this co-funded call.
  • A consortium may include up to 12 Partners. In any case, applicants should be aware that a higher number of represented countries or of Partners in a consortium will not automatically result in a positive evaluation of the proposal.
  • In order to achieve balanced consortia, the combined proportion of the overall effort that is planned by all the Partners from a single country may not exceed 60% of the total number of person months allocated to the transnational project.
  • Associated Partners, not requesting funding from any Funder, are welcome to participate in consortia as well. However, Associated Partners cannot be Coordinator, their contribution should not be essential for the project’s successful implementation and they will not count towards the minimum number of Partners.
  • Contributors to one proposal which do not perform any tasks but play a role as e.g. advisory body, can be listed as Stakeholder.
  • An individual researcher affiliated to several organisations cannot request funding from more than one Funder in this call. If affiliated to more than one organisation, an individual researcher may represent only one organisation in a proposal and that person cannot represent two or more different Partners within the consortium.
  • Each consortium applying for funding must be led by a Coordinator which must be an organisation eligible for funding from a Funder of this call and requesting funding. In consequence an Associated Partner cannot be Coordinator.
  • The same person cannot act as Principal Investigator of a Coordinator for more than one proposal. Some Funders do not allow the same person to participate in more than one proposal per call: please check the relevant Funder regulations (Annex IX).
  • The minimum project duration is 24 months and the maximum is 36 months (please check Annex IX for exceptions). The earliest possible start date for projects recommended for funding is January 2026. All projects must be completed by September 2029, unless otherwise informed.
  • Applicants must complete an ethics self-assessment as part of the proposal.
  • The information given in the pre proposals is binding. No substantial change to the scope and objectives outlined in a proposal is allowed. A limited number of changes with respect to the administrative details may be allowed upon approval by the Call Office and the Funders concerned. A list of permissible changes is provided in section 5.2.
  • The total project costs and requested funding in a proposal is by default not restricted; the costs must be appropriate to meet the project goals. Nonetheless, individual Funders may have regulations and/or restrictions concerning the funding they can award within research projects that must be respected (as an example, some Funders may limit the maximum budget a single Partner in a project can request to € 200,000). It is, therefore, essential that each Partner carefully reads their Funders regulations (see Annex IX). If in doubt, applicants are strongly encouraged to consult their FCPs who can inform them of the relevant regulations.
  • Note that the inclusion of Associated Partners is permitted ONLY upon submission of a letter of financial commitment (see Annex VIII). If a proposal includes Associated Partners, the absence of a letter of financial commitment may result in the rejection of the entire proposal.
  • The proposed research project must be consistent with the scope of this call and with the thematic priorities of the Funders involved in the proposed project which are described in the Funder regulations (see Annex IX). The proposed project must address one of the two Topics (see section 3) and at least one Theme under the selected Topic. The scope or scale of the proposed research project should exceed a single country. The proposal should not overlap, but rather be complementary with ongoing or completed projects funded by other instruments, programmes or projects, in particular past/ongoing Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe projects, projects funded under the EU Mission 'A Soil Deal for Europe' and European Innovation Partnership Operational Groups (EIP-AGRI Operational Groups) funded under the Common Agricultural Policy.

other eligibility criteria

Currently, 29 Funders from 20 different countries provide funds to this call and altogether form the Funder Board. Funders eligibility criteria must be respected and the proposed research project must be consistent with the thematic priorities of the Funder. These requirements are described in the document “Funders regulations” (see Annex IX). Funders may require additional documents according to their own regulations (see Annex IX). It has to be also noted that the requested funding may be adapted between pre and full proposal step and later during the bilateral grant negotiation process between one Partner and its respective Funder. The final decision on the total grant per Partner is decided by the respective Funder.

The table below provides an overview of the different funders per countries, their initial budget, the budget limit per projekct and the types of partners that are eligible.

Country Funder Universities Research institutes NGOs/NPOs Consumers/citizens Civil society representatives Private companies Other Budget limit per project (€) Total initial budget
Austria Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Regionen und Wasserwirtschaft Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 250,000 500,000
Belgium Fonds Innoveren en Ondernemen Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 500,000 1,500,000
Cyprus Idryma Erevnas Kai Kainotomias Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 500,000 708,000
Germany Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft Yes Yes Yes No No No No 250,000 500,000
Germany Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 350,000 2,000,000
Denmark Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Danish AgriFish Agency Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes n/a 600,000
Denmark Innovationsfonden Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 500,000 1,000,000
Estonia Regionaal- ja Põllumajandusministeerium Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 100,000 100,000
Estonia Sihtasutus Eesti Teadusagentuur Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 100,000 100,000
Spain Agencia Estatal de Investigacion Yes Yes No No No No No 325,000 1,350,000
Spain Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnologico y la Innovacion E.P.E No No No No No Yes Yes n/a 400,000
Spain Consejeria de Economia Cienca y Agenda digital – Junta de Extremadura Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 200,000 600,000
Finland Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 250,000 500,000
France Agence Nationale de la Recherche Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 400,000 2,000,000
France Pays de la Loire Regional Council No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes 300,000 300,000
Hungary Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 140,000 140,000
Italy Ministero dell'agricoltura, della sovranità alimentare e delle foreste Yes Yes Yes No No No No 300,000 600,000
Italy Autonomous Province of Bolzano / Bozen – South Tyrol Yes Yes No No No No No 300,000 450,000
Lithuania Lietuvos mokslo taryba Yes Yes No No No No No 150,000 300,000
Lithuania Lietuvos Respublikos Zemes Ukio Ministerija Yes Yes No No No No No 120,000 240,000
Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security and Nature Yes Yes No No No No No 250,000 1,000,000
Norway Norges Forskningsrad Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 400,000 1,275,000
Portugal Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 150,000 500,000
Romania Unitatea Executiva Pentru Finantarea Invatamantului superior a Cercetarii Dezvoltarii si Inovarii Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 200,000 500,000
Sweden Forskningsrådet för miljö, areella näringar och samhällsbyggande Yes Yes No No No No No 250,000 1,200,000
Slovenia Ministrstvo za Kmetijstvo Gozdarstvo in Prehrano Yes Yes Yes No No No No 200,000 400,000
Slovakia Slovenska Akademia Vied No Yes No No No No No 120.000 240,000
Turkey Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu Yes Yes No No No Yes No 200,000 400,000

 

Additional information

Topics

Agriculture & Forestry, Fishery, Food, Soil quality, 
Air Quality, Biodiversity & Environment, Climate & Climate Change, Water quality & management, 
Disaster Prevention, Resilience, Risk Management

Relevance for EU Macro-Region

EUSAIR - EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region, EUSALP - EU Strategy for the Alpine Space, EUSBSR - EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, EUSDR - EU Strategy for the Danube Region

UN Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs)

project duration

between 24 and 36 months

Additional Information

The co-funded call is conducted as a two-step-procedure. As a first step, a pre-proposal has to be submitted. If this pre-proposal is successful, the Coordinator receives an invitation to submit a full proposal. Only following such an invitation, a full proposal can be submitted. Proposals that are not submitted on time within the submission platform will not be considered and rejected. The submission of a pre proposal is compulsory to submit a full proposal. Full proposal is on invitation only, subject to a positive selection of your pre proposal.

  • Deadline pre-proposals: 17 February 2025, 2 PM CET
  • Deadline full proposals: 9 JULY 2025, 2 PM CEST

For detailed guidance on each step and call documents, please refer to the submission website: https://agroecology.ptj.de.

Proposals must be written in English.

Step 1: Pre-proposal:

  • The objective of a pre-proposal is to present the project idea and the consortium without providing much detail on the work plan. The detailed template for the pre-proposal with explanations is provided in Annex II and an example is also available within the document section of the submission platform: https://agroecology.ptj.de.
  • Following submission, pre-proposals will be checked against the general and applicable national/regional eligibility criteria as defined in the respective Funder Regulations (see Annex IX). Pre-proposals that do not pass the general eligibility check will be rejected.
  • Only eligible pre-proposals will be evaluated.
  • The information given in the pre-proposals is binding. No change to the objectives outlined in a proposal is allowed. A limited number of changes with respect to the administrative details may be allowed upon approval by the Call Office and the Funding Parties concerned. A list of permissible changes is provided in section 5.2.1 of the call document).
  • Please note that only the coordinator can carry out and complete the pre proposal submission on behalf of each applying research consortium. However, each partner needs to complete his/her part of the partner profile. 
  • For all partners of an applying consortium, it is strongly recommended to contact their respective funder contact point to clarify any questions well in advance of the submission. The contact details can be found in Annex IX (see CALL DOCUMENTS).

Step 1: Full proposal:

  • Following the invitation to submit a full proposal, the Coordinator can submit a full proposal via the submission system: https://agroecology.ptj.de. At this stage the consortium from the pre-proposal may, in exceptional cases, be changed; e.g., if one partner was deemed ineligible in the pre-proposal step. At this stage Coordinators may be invited to add partners from underrepresented countries/regions also funded as part of this call. Any proposed changes must first be communicated to the Call Office and the respective Funding Party; for more details see section 5.2.1. The new partner must meet all eligibility criteria to receive funding from its Funding Party.
  • The detailed template for full proposals with explanations is provided in Annex IV and an example is also available in the document section of the submission platform.

Contact

To see more information about this call, you can register for free here
or log in with an existing account.
Log in Register now